That's true, and no one's denying that there is a lot of common functionality. That's why I understand why they decided to merge them then.
> That's a large chunk of the needed code for composer. However, modularity does not mean duplication of code. It means separation of code. All the code that is needed by both navigator and composer should be in the browser module. Those needed only by composer can be in a separate module that makes function calls to the browser module when needed. The fact that there is common code does not diminish the need for modularity, it enforces it. > I don't think that is very big If the composer elements are small, then why did you use it as an argument to Bundy as to why browser.xpi is so large? Its either the composer elements are large (therefore should be separated) or small (which proves Bundy's point that navigator is bloatware.) IMHO. Bamm P.S. Unlike Bundy, I am not complaining about the size of Moz. I just agree that components should be on separate modules. This is good programming practice, isn't it?
