J Mosser wrote:
> Ben,
> Thanks for the great info and clarification. This is what I was
> trying to get across in my previous post(s), but I think you have the
> best explanation yet.
>
> Regards,
> J Mosser
>
>
>>
>>> and even other distributors are largely distributing mozilla
>>> applications, relatively intact.
>>
>>
>>
>> I wish they'd instead use Beonex Communicator or run their own.
>> What is meant with the statement is that Mozilla does not *deal* with
>> end-users. It does not give stuff directly to users, rather is a
>> source reprository for groups like Netscape, Beonex, ...
>>
>>> "...contribute to placing a fast, stable, and truly
>>> standards-compliant browser and mail/news reader onto the hard disks
>>> of tens of millions of Internet users..."
>>
>>
> Was this to advertise Beonex? I can't see why I would want a Gecko
> browser based on a months-old "milestone". I think K-meleon is more
> up-to-date. Surely it is obvious that the disclaimers are preventive
> protections for a litigious society. The fact is that I'm a user,
> beginning, middle or end I won't judge, who finds Mozilla makes my web
> stuff more pleasant. And, the mail-news client is so nice that
> busybody posts like this are fun to do. :-) Nigel L
>
