Al Rider wrote:
> In general Moz is superior, however, the idiosyncrocies [sure wish we
> had a spell checker, for example] and bugs [like the misplaced text
I'll agree on the spell checker. But that is a convience,
and the core needs work first. I't useless to a a correctly
spelled email if you have trouble sending it.
> caret [sp?], lack of right mouse context menu and the misplaced text on
> the right, as I type this] drive me nuts.
I'm still not sure what you find wrong with the text cursor.
And I have context menus in Solaris and linux
(I don't use Windoze any more). and hopw was the text misplaced?
I looked fine to me.
-Thomas
- News, Mail and composer bugs Al Rider
- Re: News, Mail and composer bugs Thomas Dodd
- Re: News, Mail and composer bugs J Mosser
- Re: News, Mail and composer bugs Torgeir Veimo
- Re: News, Mail and composer bugs Jason Mosser
- "Mozilla not for end users" (w... Peter Trudelle
- Re: "Mozilla not for end users... J Mosser
- Re: "Mozilla not for end users... Al Rider
- Re: "Mozilla not for end u... Sebastian Spaeth
- Re: "Mozilla not for end u... Thomas Dodd
- Re: "Mozilla not for e... Tim Wunder
- Re: SPAM - Re: "Mozill... Juan Tamad
- Re: "Mozilla not for end u... Peter Trudelle
- Re: "Mozilla not for end users... Ben Bucksch
- Re: "Mozilla not for end u... J Mosser
- Re: "Mozilla not for e... Nigel L
- Re: "Mozilla not for end u... Peter Trudelle
- Re: "Mozilla not for e... Ben Bucksch
- Re: "Mozilla not for e... Peter Trudelle
- Re: "Mozilla not for e... Simon P. Lucy
