Asa Dotzler wrote:
> Jonas Sicking wrote:
> > I'm still concerned by the fact that releases are driven by dates rather
> > than features and stability. I don't really think we can claim to have a
> > complete mozilla1.0 until it has some key features. The ones I'm burning
for
> > are html4.01, xhtml1.0, xslt, css1, stable and fast mailnews.
> >
> >
> >
> > The last time this dicussion was brought up it was put off because
someone
> > (don't remember who) wasn't able to compile a list of features for
> > mozilla1.0 because there was too much pressure to get netscape6.0 out on
the
> > streets. Now that it's out there is no reason not to compile such a
list,
> > publish it in NG's and on mozilla.org to be debated by the mozilla
> > community.
>
> I doubt that Netscape6 release had anything to do with the delay of a
> mozilla 1.0 doc. If you think a particular feature or level of
> support is important then you can help by finding the bugs in that
> feature or standard and nominating them for a fix in mozilla0.9 or
> mozilla1.0 Don't sit around waiting for someone to hand you a list of
> what Mozilla 1.0 should be, be a part of the process and help us build
> that list by adding the mozilla0.9 and mozilla1.0 keywords to bugs you
> think are important for those releases.
I'd still like to see an discussion on what things we want for mozilla 1.0
or my bet is that we'll see lots of posts like "we really can't cut this bug
or that feature for this release" as we'll aproch any 0.x release and
certainly the big 1.0 release.
/ Jonas Sicking
