Did not nsbeta2/nsbeta3 replace the beta1 keyword they had used previously,
and nsbeta2/3 were sorta analogous to netscape pr2 and 3? so _if_ such a
keyword as nsbeta1 is being used now and is not an outdated keyword on some
bugs, I would be very interested to know why they are using such confusing
terminology. Considering NS6 has already released, netscape specific bugs
or bugs from user feedback of NS6 should be tagged with another keyword such
as ns6sr1 or something (netscape6 service release 1)
Just my $0.02
MJ
"Ian Hickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Ben Bucksch wrote:
> >
> > Ian Hickson wrote:
> >
> >> the 'nsbeta1'
> >> keyword and the 'mozilla0.9' keyword mean exactly the same thing and
> >> should be used like siamese twins.
> >>
> >> Netscape managers will look at nsbeta1-nominated bugs, and Mozilla
drivers
> >> will look at mozilla0.9-nominated bugs.
> >
> > Shouldn't both groups look at both bugs?
>
> Like I said, "nod and smile, nod and smile". Ideally, both groups would
> use the same keyword and that would be it.
>
> --
> Ian Hickson )\ _. - ._.) fL
> Netscape, Standards Compliance QA /. `- ' ( `--'
> +1 650 937 6593 `- , ) - > ) \
> irc.mozilla.org:Hixie _________________________ (.' \) (.' -' __________
>
>
