Jonas Sicking wrote:
> I'm still concerned by the fact that releases are driven by dates rather
>
> than features and stability. I don't really think we can claim to have a
>
> complete mozilla1.0 until it has some key features. The ones I'm burning for
>
> are html4.01, xhtml1.0, xslt, css1, stable and fast mailnews.
>
>
>
> The last time this dicussion was brought up it was put off because someone
>
> (don't remember who) wasn't able to compile a list of features for
>
> mozilla1.0 because there was too much pressure to get netscape6.0 out on the
>
> streets. Now that it's out there is no reason not to compile such a list,
>
> publish it in NG's and on mozilla.org to be debated by the mozilla
>
> community.
I doubt that Netscape6 release had anything to do with the delay of a
mozilla 1.0 doc. If you think a particular feature or level of
support is important then you can help by finding the bugs in that
feature or standard and nominating them for a fix in mozilla0.9 or
mozilla1.0 Don't sit around waiting for someone to hand you a list of
what Mozilla 1.0 should be, be a part of the process and help us build
that list by adding the mozilla0.9 and mozilla1.0 keywords to bugs you
think are important for those releases.
-Asa
