On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Jonas Sicking wrote:

> I'm still concerned by the fact that releases are driven by dates rather
> than features and stability. I don't really think we can claim to have a
> complete mozilla1.0 until it has some key features. 

Please re-read the original post, noting in particular the footnote
associated with the 1.0 milestones:

> >    April 2001
> >  S  M Tu  W Th  F  S
> >  1  2  3  4  5  6  7
> >  8  9 10 11 12 13 14
> > 15 16 17 18 19 20 21  Mozilla 0.9.1 or 1.0*
> > 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
> > 29 30
> >    May 2001
> >        1  2  3  4  5
> >  6  7  8  9 10 11 12
> > 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
> > 20 21 22 23 24 25 26  Mozilla 0.9.2 or 1.0*
> > 27 28 29 30 31
> >
> > * depending on level of completion
> >    towards mozilla 1.0
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

-- 
Ian Hickson                                     )\     _. - ._.)       fL
Netscape, Standards Compliance QA              /. `- '  (  `--'
+1 650 937 6593                                `- , ) -  > ) \
irc.mozilla.org:Hixie _________________________  (.' \) (.' -' __________

Reply via email to