No, not the 6pm news, but I'm OPEN to any possible reports from there. Here's a couple "non-6pm news sources" to start with where this appears. http://www.sheldrake.org/articles/db.cgi?db=default&uid=default&ww=on&id=3 1&view_records=1 http://www.sheldrake.org/articles/db.cgi?db=default&uid=default&ww=on&id=2 9&view_records=1 If your papers deal with the "bias of ascertainment" in decided on which browser features to develope, then sure, e-mail them over. Otherwise, e-mail them anyways or better yet post them here for all to see.
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Greg Miller
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Gervase Markham
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Gervase Markham
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Mszlazak
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion RV
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion RV
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Greg Miller
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Mszlazak
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion RV
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Mszlazak
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion RV
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Scott I. Remick
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Greg Miller
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion DeMoN_LaG
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Jason Fleshman
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Jason Fleshman
