Randall Parker wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jul 2001 13:15:02 +0100 esteemed Gervase Markham did hold forth > thusly: > Since Netscape is really Moz+ I don't see why Moz's release should be rushed. Who said anything about rushing it? Gerv wants it released when it's ready. I want it released when it's ready. It's just that the three of us don't fully agree on what's required to make it ready and how to measure that. > Unfortunately few people are going to want to use Moz 1.0 because it is a > slow fat pig. But if you think most users won't react to it that way then you > should have nothing to fear from usability study results holding back Moz > 1.0's release. Other reasons not to use such a pass/fail study have already been given. -- http://www.classic-games.com/ http://www.indie-games.com/ Taxation Is Theft
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Greg Miller
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Gervase Markham
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Gervase Markham
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Mszlazak
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion RV
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion RV
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Greg Miller
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Mszlazak
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion RV
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Mszlazak
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion RV
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Scott I. Remick
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Randall Parker
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Greg Miller
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion DeMoN_LaG
- Re: A proposed Moz 1.0 release criterion Jason Fleshman
