On Wed, Oct 27, 1999 at 07:52:14PM +0100, Sigbj�rn Skj�ret wrote: > It's no hack, it's pure ANSI .. it's the reference buffer value for > input/output. i'd be _very_ surprised if this is true. does ANSI C3.159-1989 really describe such a variable? i don't have a copy of the standard document, but the k&r book (second, ansi edition), which i succesfully use as ansi c reference up to now, doesn't mention such a variable. there are the functions setbuf and setvbuf, however, perhaps you'd want to use one of these? greetings, -gerhard -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.36beta Monty
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.36beta Sigbj�rn Skj�ret
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.36beta Frank Baumgart
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.36beta Kimmo Mustonen
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.36beta Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.36beta Kimmo Mustonen
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.36beta Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.36beta Sigbj�rn Skj�ret
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.36beta Gerhard Wesp
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.36beta Sigbj�rn Skj�ret
- Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.36beta Gerhard Wesp
- Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] lame 3.36beta Sergey Dubov
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] LAME in commercial produtcs Albert Faber
