Gerhard Wesp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'd appreciate any pointer to discussion of usability of high-quality
> > mp3 encoding (say, 320 Kbps) for purposes of music CD archival.
>
> hmmm... for archival purposes, i'd rather recommend to use lossless
> compression, e.g. the shorten program. given today's mass storage---you
> can fit about 12 hours of lossless cd quality audio on a single 4gb dds3
> tape!
What's lossless compression?
The reason I'm chosing mp3 is that I can squese on average 5 audio CDs
into one data CD with 320 Kbps mp3s. This saves me media costs
(opposed to making backup audio copies), burning time, and shelf
space. Also, the backup copies are very easily avalable.
Can the program you mention perform comparably? Well, my question was:
just how much quality do I lose at 320 Kbps.
Thanks,
--
Arcady Genkin http://wgaf.dyndns.org
"'What good is my pity? Is not the pity the cross upon which he who
loves man is nailed?..'" (Zarathustra - F. Nietzsche)
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
