Jaroslav Lukesh schrieb am Die, 22 Aug 2000: > lame -h -m j -b 64 --voice --noshort --resample 22.05 --lowpass 11.025 > --lowpass-width 0 --mp3input x.mp3 x.small.mp3 why not lame --preset fm -h -k x.mp3 x.small.mp3 ??? but I would not use -k there. > Note that --voice options sounds better with bitrates <= 64k. mainly because the short block detection isn't tuned for LSFs. Ciao Robert -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- [MP3 ENCODER] Digital downsampling of mp3s? Stephen Kennedy
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] Digital downsampling of mp3s? Mathew Hendry
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Digital downsampling of mp3s? Jaroslav Lukesh
- [MP3 ENCODER] Re: Digital downsampling of mp3s? Robert Hegemann
- [MP3 ENCODER] Re: Digital downsampling of mp3s? Dan Nelson
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Re: Digital downsampling of... Mark Taylor
- [MP3 ENCODER] A good paper, and toolame02h mikecheng
