I wish the Pulse article had done a better job of laying out the issues
here.  I've heard a lot of talk about this but don't have a clear
understanding of all the twists and turns.

My impression is that most of the residents have lived in the houses for
a long time and have strong ties to their houses and the neighborhood.
The possibility of ownership has been held out to them for a long time.
They see the 1999 restructuring as a further removal of that
possibility.  In terms of the effect on the residents, it's a little as
if a bank was able to unilaterally change the terms of mortgages every
few years.

I believe that the CDC controls virtually all of the housing stock in
the neighborhood.  Saying "If you don't like the deal, then don't buy
the house" means telling longtime residents, "If you don't like our
terms, you can move."

It's also my impression that the residents have a profound mistrust of
the West Bank CDC.   The ongoing lack of answers about the Dania Hall
fire contributes to that mistrust.  The Strib article from November 26
(that Ms. Heller referred to earlier) went into detail about how the
long delay in sale of the building and lack of insurance came about,
pointing fingers at Joan Campbell and at the WBCDC.

Rosalind Nelson
Bancroft neighborhood, Ward 8

Cara Letofsky wrote:

>  I am sorry to see the intense criticm of the West Bank CDC's
> Transition Home Program.  Seems to me that what they are trying to do
> is provide people with opportunities to own their own homes and the
> restrictions are an attempt to make them available to the next
> families as well.  In this way the community investment in the houses
> that make them available to the first buyers are available to future
> buyers.
>
> If you don't like the deal, then don't buy the house.
>
> What do you all think?
>
> Cara Letofsky
>



_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to