>From public records, easily accessible in about 30 minutes online:

This dispute involves the property at 206 Elroy Street in South
Minneapolis, which is in the Whittier neighborhood near Lake Street and
Pillsbury Avenue.  The site is 1.45 acres.  [A map and additional
background are available on-line by searching the city site with the
term 'Elroy' and accessing an appeal of the planning commission].

The city, using federal MILES money (not sure what MILES is) acquired
the property in August 1996 for $401,700.

There was an RFP issued in 2001 for the site, with two proposals
submitted, one of which withdrew, leaving the 'Karmel Plaza' proposal
[distinct from the existing Karmel Square] as the only one.

According to the MCDA/CPED reports, the city sold the lot at 206 Elroy
Street for $126,000, in a deal that apparently closed on the city books
on May 14, 2004, though approval of the sale from MCDA came in March
2001.  The MCDA's website indicates that it agreed to sell the
lot/property to Karmel Properties, LLC, for $126,000.

Karmel Properties, LLC, according to MCDA minutes from September 2003,
is a limited liability company (LLC), with Sabri Properties, Inc., and
Whittier Community Development Corporation as principal members.

According to MCDA minutes, the development of the parcel was on
administrative hold for a period of time starting in December 2001
because of a 'federal investigation.'  The developers subsequently
requested that the hold be removed.

The MCDA reports that "the Whittier Alliance which, along with the
Whittier South Task Force & the Midtown Greenway Coalition, has
previously recommended approval of the project."

MCDA reported that the ultimate private development (with conventional
financing) would cost approximately $4.5 million and would include a
64,000 square foot building with 26,000 square feet in light industrial
use (which complies with MILES funding requirements) and 77 new on-site
parking spaces.

According to an appeal in October 2003 of a prior Planning Commission
decision related to neighborhood notification, the proposal sets 144
parking spaces as a goal and adjusts the development to offset entrances
from Pillsbury and Pleasant Streets so that parking problems noted by
condominium owners across the street are addressed.  According to the
report accompanying the appeal, 101 parking spaces are required for
Karmel Plaza, and a total of 122 spaces are required for both Karmel
Square and Karmel Plaza together.

NOW, GIVEN THIS, I ask sincerely for factual background to allegations
that the developer 'owns' a council member, that there has been 'voter
fraud and coercion,' or that there have been unethical practices on the
part of the council or others that warrant intervention by the 'FBI and
US Attorney's office.'  Really, give it your best shot.  Make a case for
why you (whoever you may be) believe the council is owned and on the
take.  I'm not asking why you may disagree with the decisions made along
the way--I'm asking genuinely for why you think this is a federal
criminal case.  

Gregory Luce
St. Paul










REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
before continuing it on the list. 
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.

For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to