Barbara Lickness wrote:
WM: This is where I begin to take issue. Barb, being American born and bred, thinks it inappropriate to put housing over industrial. I'm not sure the rest of the world agrees. Ergo, in terms familiar to a Palestinian developer, it may make perfect sense. When the city agreed to whatever they think they agreed to, at least two different notions of what it means to put housing with commercial space were operating. Dollars to doughnuts, no one thought to ask the right questions.Great information. Thanks Marian and Greg Luce. It helps to have more pieces of the puzzle. ... I am glad the Planning Commission 86'd the idea of housing on top of the new development. It just doesn't seem like a very compatible mix to have family housing on top of industrial property. I do understand the concept of live/work space but I think that it is more appropriate with retail, not industrial.
WizardMarks, Central ________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list. 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract ________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
