Michael Atherton asked:
Why force everyone else to met your needs?
Right back at you, Michael.
Why should many among us put up with the gut-level emotional disgust of
losing friends and neighbors to cancer without helping head off the
Why should employers put up with lost productivity caused by
Why should we all pay more for medical insurance because of
Why shouldn't we all have an expectation of carcinogen-free public
Am I really the person being selfish?
***Most centrally***, why should everyone meet the needs of a couple
bar owners that are unwilling to change with the times? Why shouldn't
we respond to the credible scientific evidence, that shows first- and
second- hand smoke kills?
Doesn't a ban on smoking in public venues, coupled with the right to
smoke elsewhere balance civil liberties pretty darn well?
Why shouldn't we work on gently reducing these societal effects by
phasing out the public pressures to smoke by putting a lid on this
harmful behavior in our public spaces?
It's the same reason we banned asbestos. But that hurt asbestos
It's the same reason we control mercury emissions. But that hurt power
It's the same reason we will ban smoking in public places. But on the
whole, its at worst debatable whether that hurts bars, though it will
hurt some individually. But it will hurt cigarette producers.
It's going to happen. If Ireland and New York City can stick with it,
I think we'll be just fine. Perhaps Molly Quinn's just wasn't Irish
The Saintly City
1. Be civil! Please read the NEW RULES at http://www.e-democracy.org/rules. If
you think a member is in violation, contact the list manager at [EMAIL
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn
Post messages to: mailto:email@example.com
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls