Laurens Holst wrote:
> It's kind of an unlikely scenario. The invisible-enemies version will
> probably be there before the visible-enemies version. So an visible-only
> engine is highly unlikely...
> But anyways, it's best to have it flexible.
Agreed. :)
(fighting weaklings)
> If the experience you gain from them doesn't lower every level (which I
> think, should), then at least the levelup-limit increases. So it's not
> very... errm... 'rendabel' to fight low-level enemies.
This looks like a cognate for "rendavel". `:)))
Anyway, this is the common approach and I think
it should be used. It's determined by logic:
stronger enemies give more experience. <:)
> > I like more the third option, because it's
> > more similar to the RPGs I like. `:)
> I agree. However, it's up to the game's designer.
That would be ideal, but unfortunately we can't
have an ideal engine. <:) Combining this with
the "less chances" approach would be cool. <:)
[]s,
----- Parn (ICQ#1693182)
/| | | |\
\| ___ |/ http://parn.cjb.net/
\/ ----- \/ Parn's Music Station
| | Game Music XMs and more!
-- -- Izati Aba Mehinam Eto Kafe Nan
****
MSX Mailinglist. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and put "unsubscribe msx [EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes) in
the body (not the subject) of the message.
Problems? contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More information on MSX can be found in the following places:
The MSX faq: http://www.faq.msxnet.org/
The MSX newsgroup: comp.sys.msx
The MSX IRC channel: #MSX on Undernet
****
