But I think what Dave is telling me is that Gemplus distinguishes between the cards that have the dual ATRs by calling them "FIPS" or "NON-FIPS"--don't ask me why.
Carl On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:52:37 -0700, Peter Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FIPS (140-1 or 140-2) makes no difference.A GSM card with 2 ATRs can be > FIPS-accredited. The FIPS 140-1 only address the crypto boundary, not the > 7816 conformance. > > You just need cards targetted for PCs. > > >From: Carl Youngblood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], MUSCLE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: David Corcoran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >CC: MUSCLE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: [Muscle] Re: your G+ card > >Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:40:00 -0700 > > > > > >Yeah, I just noticed on my invoice that it says GEMXPRESSO PRO 64K PK > >NON-FIPS SC. I didn't realize that FIPS made a difference in this > >case. I have called them and they are going to send me out the right > >kind of cards this time. > > > >I'm surprised that nobody on the list caught this problem earlier. I > >guess the next time somebody is complaining of similar symptoms we > >will know what to tell them. > > > >Thanks, > >Carl > > > >On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:31:46 -0500, David Corcoran > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Well, they sent you some GSM/3G cards. The cards you want are: > > > GemXpresso Pro 64K - FIPS - 0703 or something like that ..... > > > I would contact them and tell them they sent you dual ATR cards for > > > 3G/GSM phones and that is not what you wanted .... > > > > > > Unfortunately, the smart card industry hasn't figured out how to > > > portray their version control/revisions to their customers so you are > > > stuck with a card that is called the Cyberflex or the GemXPresso Pro > > > but there could be 100's of configurations of them .... > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 27, 2004, at 12:15 PM, Carl Youngblood wrote: > > > > > > > I told them to send me the GemXpresso Pro 64K card. Is there more > > > > than one type of this card? I also explained to the technical rep. > > > > that I was intending to load the muscle applet on it, so I don't know > > > > why he would have given me the wrong card. Are there any visible > > > > differences that will allow me to distinguish between the two types of > > > > cards? > > > > > > > > On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:57:37 -0500, David Corcoran > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Hi Carl, > > > >> > > > >> Yes, this seems like a 3G/GSM combo card that you have (with the dual > > > >> ATR) - since these are meant to work in phones they don't have to > >deal > > > >> with simultaneous application access. > > > >> Any reason why this card was chosen rather than the standard Gemplus > > > >> FIPS 64k Java Card ? > > > >> > > > >> Dave > >_______________________________________________ > >Muscle mailing list > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle > > _______________________________________________ > Muscle mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle > _______________________________________________ Muscle mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.drizzle.com/mailman/listinfo/muscle
