Re: those users (was "Re: Reply to all???")

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

David Champion proclaimed on mutt-users that:

>On 2000.06.30, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>       "Mrinal Kalakrishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 
>> The advantage with LinuxDoc/DocBook DTDs is that you can convert it to
>> any format you like later. So you can have an online HTML version,
>> plain text, PS, PDF, etc.. (like the mutt docs)
>
>The disadvantage, last time I checked, is that it's still tedious to
>get them processed on Unix.  Maybe that's not necessary, but I always
>argue with any decision that (in practice) drives data or a process out
>of the realm of portability.

... so what format do you suggest?  HTML is the best - still (imho)

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian + [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bradley's Bromide:
        If computers get too powerful, we can organize them into a
        committee -- that will do them in.