On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 23:37:43 +1300 martin f krafft <madd...@madduck.net> wrote:
> Regarding the following, written by “Nuno Silva” on 2019-10-30 at > 09:21 Uhr +0000: > > > > There are users who don’t need text/html. It’s okay to want some > > way to use HTML for e-mail in mutt, but I’d say it’s not okay to > > say everybody needs it. > > I’d love to see some statistics about the age of mutt users. > > Just to be clear: any solution will be configurable, so nobody will > be forced to use it. -- That doesn't really help. From my point the issue is not only what I have to configure or what can be configured, but also how much code is behind doing that. Less code is easier to manage than more code. I can't see the benefit of junking up mutt with HTML or anything else that is out of scope for a command-line mail client. Remember, some of us use mutt on a console with no GUI.... /jl
