On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 12:40 -0500, Cory Papenfuss wrote: > That's not necessary... I believe you. I do not agree that > "cannot visually see a difference" equivalent to "perfect," however.
Maybe this is so, but what do I really care beyond it "looks perfect"?
Which I can get with the G400 and DirectFB. I have yet to see anything
even close with the G400 X11/framebuffer/matroxset.
This winds up devolving into similar discussions about harmonic
perfection. What do I care if an audio signal is less than perfect
beyond the range that I/we can hear?
Oh, and I tried to use your ntsc modeline and got an error from X saying
"hsync out of range". My "Monitor" configuration is:
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "Monitor0"
Option "DPMS" "true"
#HorizSync 28.0 - 78.0 # Warning: This may fry very old Monitors
HorizSync 28.0 - 96.0 # Warning: This may fry old Monitors
VertRefresh 50.0 - 76.0 # Very conservative. May flicker.
DisplaySize 655 490 # mm
# These are some Modelines that happen to work on many systems
# Especially the "1024x768" has been thoroughly tested, even on Laptops
Modeline "640x480" 25.175 640 664 760 800 480 491 493 525 #60Hz
Modeline "800x600" 40.12 800 848 968 1056 600 601 605 628 #60Hz
ModeLine "coryntsci" 14.3 720 760 824 910 480 484 492 525 interlace
EndSection
Do I not also need a corresponding set of framebuffer timings to match
the X Modeline? It was the framebuffer timings that I was referring to
before when I said that one set of timings at a given resolution does
not seem to work from one card to another.
b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ mythtv-users mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
