It appears that Mike Hammett via NANOG <[email protected]> said: >Important in what you said is the ability to seek redress. The Internet often >doesn't provide good means of seeking redress.
You can always get a refund of what you paid for the mail they don't deliver. R's, John >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <[email protected]> >To: "North American Network Operators Group" <[email protected]> >Cc: "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> >Sent: Monday, August 18, 2025 9:36:33 AM >Subject: Re: Worsening google service reputation and abuse > > >Truth. Reduced to its simplest terms, if the way you run (or don’t bother to >run) your network causes issues to other networks, >those networks may take whatever action necessary to protect their network, >systems and users. > > >The problem of random, indiscriminate blocking and no possible redress was why >these community / industry organizations and best >practices came about. So there are at least processes that you can follow to >get yourself unblocked, worst comes to worst. > > >The other best practices about keeping bad actors off your network? Well, they >seem much more difficult in practice than on paper. >Even the most proactive organization can’t avoid it 100%, despite their >spending time and effort on it. Orgs that don’t care or >don’t want to know about the problem? No need to say anything further about >those. _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/NMBKYLEAQXEWG25IB36LFYIPVGSDEOM7/
