On 8/19/25 3:17 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
Interesting. Do you have any links about this? I was talking to him a
few months back about some things.
Just google ietf dkim to find the mailing list. It should have pointers
to any drafts too.
Mike
Thanks
On Tue, Aug 19, 2025, 5:16 PM Michael Thomas via NANOG
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 8/19/25 3:13 PM, Josh Reynolds via NANOG wrote:
> Holdup. What did I miss about Richard Clayton?
If it's the same Richard Clayton as the one I think it is, he's
off on a
useless adventure to reinvent DKIM for the hell of it, for one.
Mike
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2025, 5:10 PM Christopher Morrow via NANOG <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 5:54 PM Barry Shein via NANOG
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Are there any good sources breaking down spam (et al) behavior?
>> <snip>
>>
>>> But my question is whether anyone is already doing this?
>>>
>> I think you want to find Suresh and the SpamHaus folks (at least)
>> (they are different orgs with slightly different views)
>>
>> On the past I'd also have said: "And Richard Clayton" but :(
<sad panda>
>> There's been a bunch of presentation work on these things over
the years...
>> _______________________________________________
>> NANOG mailing list
>>
>>
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/ZSBVGKR3JOINGH436SYPRCGZRF3AC7C6/
> _______________________________________________
> NANOG mailing list
>
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/LLIBXT44AKEXEXV5676ALIEJ5F6J7QIM/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/OPCTBGUR5QJ2CJNJG2JTQ2AC34RNYZOY/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/ANZZREETUSNWQOPLWJVAVBMPPUXFHMJV/
