Interesting. Do you have any links about this? I was talking to him a few months back about some things.
Thanks On Tue, Aug 19, 2025, 5:16 PM Michael Thomas via NANOG < [email protected]> wrote: > > On 8/19/25 3:13 PM, Josh Reynolds via NANOG wrote: > > Holdup. What did I miss about Richard Clayton? > > If it's the same Richard Clayton as the one I think it is, he's off on a > useless adventure to reinvent DKIM for the hell of it, for one. > > Mike > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2025, 5:10 PM Christopher Morrow via NANOG < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 5:54 PM Barry Shein via NANOG > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Are there any good sources breaking down spam (et al) behavior? > >> <snip> > >> > >>> But my question is whether anyone is already doing this? > >>> > >> I think you want to find Suresh and the SpamHaus folks (at least) > >> (they are different orgs with slightly different views) > >> > >> On the past I'd also have said: "And Richard Clayton" but :( <sad panda> > >> There's been a bunch of presentation work on these things over the > years... > >> _______________________________________________ > >> NANOG mailing list > >> > >> > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/ZSBVGKR3JOINGH436SYPRCGZRF3AC7C6/ > > _______________________________________________ > > NANOG mailing list > > > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/LLIBXT44AKEXEXV5676ALIEJ5F6J7QIM/ > _______________________________________________ > NANOG mailing list > > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/OPCTBGUR5QJ2CJNJG2JTQ2AC34RNYZOY/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/VSGFJSJJWFVRRKHS2REORT47SDXYNMOZ/
