On 8/19/25 3:13 PM, Josh Reynolds via NANOG wrote:
Holdup. What did I miss about Richard Clayton?
If it's the same Richard Clayton as the one I think it is, he's off on a
useless adventure to reinvent DKIM for the hell of it, for one.
Mike
On Tue, Aug 19, 2025, 5:10 PM Christopher Morrow via NANOG <
[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 5:54 PM Barry Shein via NANOG
<[email protected]> wrote:
Are there any good sources breaking down spam (et al) behavior?
<snip>
But my question is whether anyone is already doing this?
I think you want to find Suresh and the SpamHaus folks (at least)
(they are different orgs with slightly different views)
On the past I'd also have said: "And Richard Clayton" but :( <sad panda>
There's been a bunch of presentation work on these things over the years...
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/ZSBVGKR3JOINGH436SYPRCGZRF3AC7C6/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/LLIBXT44AKEXEXV5676ALIEJ5F6J7QIM/
_______________________________________________
NANOG mailing list
https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/OPCTBGUR5QJ2CJNJG2JTQ2AC34RNYZOY/
