On 24 August 2011 16:22, Lomax, Michael P. <mlo...@quadramed.com> wrote: > I then ran `make` from the source top level directory and after the `make > test` failed, I found that I did get some warnings (line 994) that read: > > “md5.c: In function 'MDblock': > md5.c:198: warning: passing argument 1 of 'MDreverse' discards qualifiers > from pointer target type > md5.c:278: warning: passing argument 1 of 'MDreverse' discards qualifiers > from pointer target type^”
You can safely ignore warnings. These are typically just the compiler being picky. > I then did the `make test`. At the bottom of the file you will see that all > but 1 test, the last test, succeeded Actually, it's not the last test that fails - it seems to be one of the elements within test T072com2secunix_simple. If you want to get to the bottom of this, then have another look in /tmp. There should be a directory containing the details of this failure (just as there was for the earlier problems). It's the contents of these testing directories that are typically the most use in trying to track down a problem - a copy of the commands run, and the output produced is of limited use here. But as Thomas says - if things are working for all but one (fairly obscure) test, then I wouldn't worry about it. It should be safe to install and run. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EMC VNX: the world's simplest storage, starting under $10K The only unified storage solution that offers unified management Up to 160% more powerful than alternatives and 25% more efficient. Guaranteed. http://p.sf.net/sfu/emc-vnx-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
