But the refugees ARE a European problem, and France was in the mid-east as
well, England had its empire, Belgium its Leopold. You keep going after
blame after blame after blame. Why not ask why the US is doing little?
Apparently it's giving a lot more aid than other countries (think that was
in the Guardian, I might be able to track the source down) combined. And
Europe would not be taking refugees in, were they not coming across "its"
borders. That's not the case here; what is the case is the horrific
xenophobia which is placing the U.S. under lockdown. I see lots of calls
for humanitarian support and aid, very little for bringing refugees over -
I'm also not sure how that would be done, where they would come from - and
this in the case of brutal opposition to the 11 million (apparently)
undocumented workers/migrants here from central and south America - which
is obviously far more than the total migrants to date in Europe. I'd like
to see ALL refugees everywhere legalized; I can't do anything re: Europe,
but we voice our opposition here to the Republican party and its proto-
fascistic take on the world. That's pretty much all I can say about it.
- Alan
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015, Ana Vald?s wrote:
We see in the whole European world ppl gathering in supporting the refugees
biking to Calais from London with tents food and medicines in Stockholm
where I lived for almost my whole adult life thousands of families are
offering to open their houses to refugees.
And I am talking about a country with a xenophobe party with almost one
million voters.
Alan and the Americans in this list what are the US doing? I don't mean the
government but the ppl where are the rallies to help the refugees from the
Middle East, a region in turmoil since the wars started by the US and their
geopolitical strategies?
The refugees can't be an European problem.
Ana
El sep 4, 2015 2:39 PM, "Alan Sondheim" <[email protected]> escribi?:
Germany is set to take in 800,000 refugees by the end of the
year.
America, a country that won two World Wars, went to the moon,
and did "the other things," has taken in, well, far fewer.
Quoth the Guardian:
The US has admitted approximately 1,500 Syrian refugees
since the beginning of the civil war there in 2011, mostly
within the last fiscal year. Since April, the number of admitted
refugees has more than doubled from an estimate of 700.
...
Anna Greene, IRCs director of policy & advocacy for US
programs, said the 1,500 people the US has admitted thus far
doesnt even begin to scratch the surface of what is needed and
what could really make a difference.
Oxfam wants the US to up that number to 70,000 by the end of
2016.
Correction: This post and its headline originally said that
Germany planned to take in 800,000 Syrian refugees by the end of
the year. That is incorrect. It is 800,000 refugees total.
- Alan
==
email archive http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
web http://www.alansondheim.org / cell 718-813-3285
music: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/
current text http://www.alansondheim.org/tj.txt
==
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
==
email archive http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
web http://www.alansondheim.org / cell 718-813-3285
music: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/
current text http://www.alansondheim.org/tj.txt
==
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
