yes/support. Thanks. - Xufeng
On Friday, October 13, 2017, Kent Watsen <[email protected]> wrote: > All, > > Now that we have resolved the module naming issue on the list (i.e. > that keeps the original rfc module names and updates the unwanted > legacy nodes to have status 'obsolete'), rather than wait for the > changes to be made in the individual document, we'd like to move > ahead with the adoption now, with the understanding that these > changes will be made in the -01 version of the adopted draft. > > This is start of a two-week poll on making draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-03 > a working group document. Please send email to the list indicating > "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state > your reservations with the document. If yes, please also feel free to > provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG > document. > > The poll ends Oct 27. > > Thanks, > Kent (and Lou) > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] <javascript:;> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
