As co-author, I support and am not aware of any IPR. Thanks, Yingzhen
-----Original Message----- From: netmod [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 10:04 AM To: Kent Watsen <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-03 As co-author, I support and am not aware of any IPR. Thanks, acee On 10/13/17, 10:37 AM, "netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >All, > >Now that we have resolved the module naming issue on the list (i.e. >that keeps the original rfc module names and updates the unwanted >legacy nodes to have status 'obsolete'), rather than wait for the >changes to be made in the individual document, we'd like to move ahead >with the adoption now, with the understanding that these changes will >be made in the -01 version of the adopted draft. > >This is start of a two-week poll on making >draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-03 a working group document. Please send >email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If >indicating no, please state your reservations with the document. If >yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see >addressed once the document is a WG document. > >The poll ends Oct 27. > >Thanks, >Kent (and Lou) > >_______________________________________________ >netmod mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
