2.5 lakhs of farmers committed suicide in last 15 years.. Dont like terms find another job
millions of workers protested on feb 28 Dont like terms find another job 77% of population earns less than Rs20 / day Dont like terms find another job On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:26 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday 13 March 2012 23:09:23 Ravi Shanker wrote: > > from the article > > > > >Information technology (IT) industry in the State, which has enjoyed a > > > > blanket exemption from the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, > > 1946 for 11 years, will now have to adhere to the rules under this labour > > legislation. > > < > > > > during the recession time(I'm not sure any IT company reported loss or a > > considerable dip in the profit growth ), i have seen worst types of > > retrenchments. sending off a woman employee who has been working for > past 5 > > years from the cubicle and from company premises with in minutes with the > > help of security personnel is very vivid in mind. I hope IT companies > will > > not be able to do this any more. > > > > > I'd immediately replace all the women who worked in my office with men > in > > > > order to keep costs and complexity down.< > > > > by deconstructing Raj's statements, one may infer following points. > > > > 1) Hiring and firing at the employer's will is the best thing happened in > > the industry. > > Dont like terms find another job. > > > 2) working post 8pm should be taken for granted. > > Dont like terms find another job > > > 3) Only women are having security concerns. all men are capable to handle > > any man handling situation. (& there by male employees are supposed to > work > > post 8pm. If he declines, then the employer is free to use the > retrenchment > > tool) > > Dont like terms find another job > > > 4) and last but not least - by nature, women are money eaters, loss > makers, > > and not suitable for the industry, so where ever possible, one should try > > to replace her with men. > > If you ask industry to take responsibility for preventing crimes, which is > the absolute indisputable duty of the state. > > Ask the very same women how they find it unplatable when daft police and > politicians talk about "indecent" clothes, visit to pubs etc. How about > laws > that define these for women? I doubt that there will be anything more > ridiculous. > > You dont make safe the streets for this or that person, or from 9 to 5, > or at > 10 Janpath. > > You make it safe 365 days of the year in 100% of the country, for 100% of > the > people. Not by stupid passing the buck, curfews, shutting bars and such > other > rubbish, but pursuing every crime and getting 100% conviction. > Present conviction rate: 4% !!! > > The state is passing the buck, and everyone is falling for it. > > > > >Incidentally, what is the "exploitation of women" that is specific to > > > > this sector and not covered under normal laws? < > > > > I'm also interested to know more about this. > > > -- > Rgds > JTD > _______________________________________________ > network mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in >
_______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
