>>Dont like terms find another job Don't let companies make stupid terms and conditions.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:06 AM, haynes davis <[email protected]>wrote: > 2.5 lakhs of farmers committed suicide in last 15 years.. > > Dont like terms find another job > > millions of workers protested on feb 28 > > Dont like terms find another job > > 77% of population earns less than Rs20 / day > > Dont like terms find another job > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:26 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tuesday 13 March 2012 23:09:23 Ravi Shanker wrote: >> > from the article >> > >> > >Information technology (IT) industry in the State, which has enjoyed a >> > >> > blanket exemption from the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, >> > 1946 for 11 years, will now have to adhere to the rules under this >> labour >> > legislation. >> > < >> > >> > during the recession time(I'm not sure any IT company reported loss or a >> > considerable dip in the profit growth ), i have seen worst types of >> > retrenchments. sending off a woman employee who has been working for >> past 5 >> > years from the cubicle and from company premises with in minutes with >> the >> > help of security personnel is very vivid in mind. I hope IT companies >> will >> > not be able to do this any more. >> > >> > > I'd immediately replace all the women who worked in my office with >> men in >> > >> > order to keep costs and complexity down.< >> > >> > by deconstructing Raj's statements, one may infer following points. >> > >> > 1) Hiring and firing at the employer's will is the best thing happened >> in >> > the industry. >> >> Dont like terms find another job. >> >> > 2) working post 8pm should be taken for granted. >> >> Dont like terms find another job >> >> > 3) Only women are having security concerns. all men are capable to >> handle >> > any man handling situation. (& there by male employees are supposed to >> work >> > post 8pm. If he declines, then the employer is free to use the >> retrenchment >> > tool) >> >> Dont like terms find another job >> >> > 4) and last but not least - by nature, women are money eaters, loss >> makers, >> > and not suitable for the industry, so where ever possible, one should >> try >> > to replace her with men. >> >> If you ask industry to take responsibility for preventing crimes, which >> is >> the absolute indisputable duty of the state. >> >> Ask the very same women how they find it unplatable when daft police and >> politicians talk about "indecent" clothes, visit to pubs etc. How about >> laws >> that define these for women? I doubt that there will be anything more >> ridiculous. >> >> You dont make safe the streets for this or that person, or from 9 to 5, >> or at >> 10 Janpath. >> >> You make it safe 365 days of the year in 100% of the country, for 100% of >> the >> people. Not by stupid passing the buck, curfews, shutting bars and such >> other >> rubbish, but pursuing every crime and getting 100% conviction. >> Present conviction rate: 4% !!! >> >> The state is passing the buck, and everyone is falling for it. >> > >> > >Incidentally, what is the "exploitation of women" that is specific to >> > >> > this sector and not covered under normal laws? < >> > >> > I'm also interested to know more about this. >> >> >> -- >> Rgds >> JTD >> _______________________________________________ >> network mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in >> > > > _______________________________________________ > network mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in > >
_______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
