On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:48 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Right now you have AIR INDIA, one of the worst airlines, sucking out money.
> It's imminent "demise" has been abetted by some crooked decisions, but no way
> could it have survived this far without state patronage and monopoly rights.
>

 But who screwed AIRINDIA? Workers? No. The political masters of
AIRINDIA are responsible for the downfall of AIRINDIA. Else how come
an airline which was posting profits sudden ran into loss. Going into
details of this would require a thread of its own. But my point is,
dont give half researched examples.

>> These employees organisation
>> should force their own version of 'terms of work'. Either the
>> employers accept those terms or let them close down.
>>
>
> Precisely my point, but perhaps not what you have in mind, which is striking
> work and preventing others less pandered from taking up their seats. If the
> terms are so rotten, that company wont find competent employees and will
> shut. In the past labour militancy (alongwith other parallel factors) led to
> the shutdown of industry. But that was not a disaster, as industries moved to
> better locations, and new industry with better working conditions replaced
> them. For a shot while both labour and industrialists were playing holier
> than thou, before economics forced better sense to prevail.
>
 You are completely disconnected with the conditions in India. You
think if unsuitable terms are offered the organisation will shutdown.
Maybe in your dream. For man power intensive jobs in India there is no
dearth manpower. If unsuitable work conditions were to shutdown
organisation Army would have been the first one to shutdown. But that
doesnt happen because there is no dearth of people willing to join
Army. Ditto for Police and several other govt. jobs.

regards
Vivek
-- 
The hidden harmony is better than the obvious!!
_______________________________________________
network mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in

Reply via email to