> Precisely my point, but perhaps not what you have in mind, which is > striking > work and preventing others less pandered from taking up their seats. If the > terms are so rotten, that company wont find competent employees and will > shut. In the past labour militancy (alongwith other parallel factors) led > to > the shutdown of industry. But that was not a disaster, as industries moved > to > better locations, and new industry with better working conditions replaced > them. For a shot while both labour and industrialists were playing holier > than thou, before economics forced better sense to prevail. > > do you have any statistics on industries closed because of labour militancy. what percentage of closed industries is because of labour militancy? (what were the cause for militancy is another matter) what percentage is caused by economic policies? what % is caused by national/international monopolies? what % is because of board of directors/ceo/cfo/coo/managerial idiocy? (this should be the largest)
if i tell not more than 5% of closures are because of labour militancy how will you object it?
_______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
