[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I believe that the entire refcount debugging model was built around >ensuring that a thread that takes the ref also releases the ref >before it exits. This cannot be done for long-lived refs e.g., >the ones taken for ire->ire_nce (hence we have ugly macros like >NCE_REFHOLD_TO_REFHOLD_NOTR). > > > yes, that is right.
>I'm not sure how Jim's design changes that basic assumption behind >the trace_refs. > > no, it doesn't. thirumalai >--sowmini > > _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
