Hi Jim and Garrett, thank you both for your comments.
James Carlson wrote: > Yep. If it really is just bare IPv4 frames, then GLDv3 will probably > be a bit of a challenge. I don't think that "faking" Ethernet framing > is a great solution [...] Me neither, but I don't see a better way at this point. A straight forward idea would be to allow layer3 interfaces (something like DL_NONE) in GLDv3. I don't want to judge on whether implementing such a GLD device type would be worth it, but IMHO this would be the cleanest solution to avoid artificial (un)framing for devices or drivers which only implement ipv4/6. Nils _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
