Hi Jim, >> (suggested to implement DL_NONE dev type for GLDv3) > Yes, I think that's the best solution, and something like that is > eventually coming in GLDv3.
Very good. Thanks for putting this onto the list (if it was not already on it). > For now, if I were dealing with an interface like this, I'd be pretty > well tempted to stick with plain old DLPIv2 and STREAMS -- not even > GLD. I do see your point and I thank you for your recommendation. There are two reasons why I prefer GLDv3: a) I want to learn more about it and b) the driver uses the new USBA framework and thus it would not run on anything below s10 anyway. I hope that these are good reasons. Jim and Garrett, thank you again for your help and advice. Nils _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
