networking-discuss  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [networking-discuss] explanation for why mac, dld, dls, and softmac are separate modules Garrett D'Amore
  • Re: [networking-discuss] explanation for why mac, dld, dls, and softmac are separate modules Nicolas Droux
  • Re: [networking-discuss] explanation for why mac, dld, dls, and softmac are separate modules Garrett D'Amore
  • Re: [networking-discuss] explanation for why mac, dld, dls, and softmac are separate modules Peter Memishian
  • Re: [networking-discuss] explanation for why mac, dld, dls, and softmac are separate modules Garrett D'Amore
  • Re: [networking-discuss] explanation for why mac, dld, dls, and softmac are separate modules Peter Memishian
  • Re: [networking-discuss] explanation for why mac, dld, dls, and softmac are separate modules Garrett D'Amore
• [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring Erik Nordmark
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring Sebastien Roy
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring Erik Nordmark
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring Sebastien Roy
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring Erik Nordmark
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring Sebastien Roy
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring Erik Nordmark
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring Sebastien Roy
  • [networking-discuss] IPsec question: Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring Erik Nordmark
  • Re: [networking-discuss] IPsec question: Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring Dan McDonald
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring Darren Reed
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring Erik Nordmark
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring Darren Reed
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring Anders Persson
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring Erik Nordmark
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring Anders Persson
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring Erik Nordmark
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring venugopal iyer
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring Kacheong Poon
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring Erik Nordmark
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring venugopal iyer
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring Erik Nordmark
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring James Carlson
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring sowmini . varadhan
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring James Carlson
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring Peter Memishian
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring sowmini . varadhan
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring James Carlson
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring sowmini . varadhan
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring Peter Memishian
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring sowmini . varadhan
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring Peter Memishian
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring Dan McDonald
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of code review for IP datapath refactoring Erik Nordmark
• [networking-discuss] Link Aggregation + vlan tagging + Network Boot Prakash Kochummen
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Link Aggregation + vlan tagging + Network Boot Peter Memishian
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Link Aggregation + vlan tagging + Network Boot Prakash Kochummen
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Link Aggregation + vlan tagging + Network Boot Peter Memishian
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Link Aggregation + vlan tagging + Network Boot Prakash Kochummen
• [networking-discuss] OSOL 2008.11 won't complete booting after add_drv Fabio Oliveira
  • Re: [networking-discuss] OSOL 2008.11 won't complete booting after add_drv Michael Li
• [networking-discuss] Fwd: [network-sip-discuss] buffers not returing from stack (gldv3 network driver) pradeep gopana
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Fwd: [network-sip-discuss] buffers not returing from stack (gldv3 network driver) Paul Durrant
• [networking-discuss] Reminder: Design review for IP datapath refactoring Erik Nordmark
• Re: [networking-discuss] [crossbow-discuss] buffers not returing from stack (gldv3 network driver) Kais Belgaied
  • Re: [networking-discuss] [crossbow-discuss] buffers not returing from stack (gldv3 network driver) Jason King
  • Re: [networking-discuss] [crossbow-discuss] buffers not returing from stack (gldv3 network driver) Garrett D'Amore
  • Re: [networking-discuss] [crossbow-discuss] buffers not returing from stack (gldv3 network driver) Jason King
  • Re: [networking-discuss] [crossbow-discuss] buffers not returing from stack (gldv3 network driver) Min Miles Xu
  • Re: [networking-discuss] [crossbow-discuss] buffers not returing from stack (gldv3 network driver) Pradeep
  • Re: [networking-discuss] [crossbow-discuss] buffers not returing from stack (gldv3 network driver) Andrew Gallatin
• [networking-discuss] buffers not returing from stack (gldv3 network driver) Pradeep
  • Re: [networking-discuss] buffers not returing from stack (gldv3 network driver) James Carlson
  • Re: [networking-discuss] buffers not returing from stack (gldv3 network driver) Pradeep
  • Re: [networking-discuss] buffers not returing from stack (gldv3 network driver) James Carlson
  • Re: [networking-discuss] buffers not returing from stack (gldv3 network driver) Yunsong (Roamer) Lu
  • Re: [networking-discuss] buffers not returing from stack (gldv3 network driver) Peter Memishian
• [networking-discuss] Crossbow etherstubs/vnics: shut down interfaces / prevent traffic forwarding? Nils Goroll
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Crossbow etherstubs/vnics: shut down interfaces / prevent traffic forwarding? Kais Belgaied
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Crossbow etherstubs/vnics: shut down interfaces / prevent traffic forwarding? Nils Goroll
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Crossbow etherstubs/vnics: shut down interfaces / prevent traffic forwarding? Nils Goroll
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Crossbow etherstubs/vnics: shut down interfaces / prevent traffic forwarding? Nils Goroll
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Crossbow etherstubs/vnics: shut down interfaces / prevent traffic forwarding? Nicolas Droux
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Crossbow etherstubs/vnics: shut down interfaces / prevent traffic forwarding? David Edmondson
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Crossbow etherstubs/vnics: shut down interfaces / prevent traffic forwarding? Nils Goroll
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Crossbow etherstubs/vnics: shut down interfaces / prevent traffic forwarding? Nils Goroll
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Crossbow etherstubs/vnics: shut down interfaces / prevent traffic forwarding? Nicolas Droux
• [networking-discuss] route -sendpipe vs. tcp_xxxx_hitwat Dale Ghent
  • Re: [networking-discuss] route -sendpipe vs. tcp_xxxx_hitwat Peter Memishian
  • Re: [networking-discuss] route -sendpipe vs. tcp_xxxx_hitwat Kacheong Poon
• [networking-discuss] bonding modes viveks
  • Re: [networking-discuss] bonding modes James Carlson
  • Re: [networking-discuss] bonding modes viveks
  • Re: [networking-discuss] bonding modes James Carlson
  • Re: [networking-discuss] bonding modes viveks
  • Re: [networking-discuss] bonding modes viveks
  • Re: [networking-discuss] bonding modes Peter Memishian
  • Re: [networking-discuss] bonding modes viveks
  • Re: [networking-discuss] bonding modes James Carlson
  • Re: [networking-discuss] bonding modes viveks
  • Re: [networking-discuss] bonding modes James Carlson
• [networking-discuss] Connect to Wifi on booting Darko Hojnik
• [networking-discuss] multiple addresses to a mac address, using dhcp Daniel
  • Re: [networking-discuss] multiple addresses to a mac address, using dhcp sowmini . varadhan
  • Re: [networking-discuss] multiple addresses to a mac address, using dhcp Darren Reed
  • Re: [networking-discuss] multiple addresses to a mac address, using dhcp Gary Mills
• [networking-discuss] large packets from network stack to GLD3 driver without TSO/LSO indicator Tom Chen
  • Re: [networking-discuss] large packets from network stack to GLD3 driver without TSO/LSO indicator Yunsong (Roamer) Lu
• [networking-discuss] hcts4.3 setup failure on Sparc with nv121 OpenSolaris OS Tom Chen
• [networking-discuss] different ip's on different subnet's for the same interface viveks
  • Re: [networking-discuss] different ip's on different subnet's for the same interface James Carlson
  • Re: [networking-discuss] different ip's on different subnet's for the same interface viveks
  • Re: [networking-discuss] different ip's on different subnet's for the same interface Jie Gao
  • Re: [networking-discuss] different ip's on different subnet's for the same interface Mike Oliver
• [networking-discuss] problem with GLDv3 when m_instance != 0 Garrett D'Amore
  • Re: [networking-discuss] problem with GLDv3 when m_instance != 0 Sebastien Roy
  • Re: [networking-discuss] problem with GLDv3 when m_instance != 0 Nicolas Droux
  • Re: [networking-discuss] problem with GLDv3 when m_instance != 0 Garrett D'Amore
  • Re: [networking-discuss] problem with GLDv3 when m_instance != 0 Garrett D'Amore
  • Re: [networking-discuss] problem with GLDv3 when m_instance != 0 Paul Durrant
  • Re: [networking-discuss] problem with GLDv3 when m_instance != 0 Paul Durrant
  • Re: [networking-discuss] problem with GLDv3 when m_instance != 0 Garrett D'Amore
  • Re: [networking-discuss] problem with GLDv3 when m_instance != 0 Peter Memishian
  • Re: [networking-discuss] problem with GLDv3 when m_instance != 0 Garrett D'Amore
  • Re: [networking-discuss] problem with GLDv3 when m_instance != 0 Cathy Zhou
  • Re: [networking-discuss] problem with GLDv3 when m_instance != 0 Garrett D'Amore
  • Re: [networking-discuss] problem with GLDv3 when m_instance != 0 Cathy Zhou
  • Re: [networking-discuss] problem with GLDv3 when m_instance != 0 Garrett D'Amore
  • Re: [networking-discuss] problem with GLDv3 when m_instance != 0 Cathy Zhou
  • Re: [networking-discuss] problem with GLDv3 when m_instance != 0 Garrett D'Amore
  • Re: [networking-discuss] problem with GLDv3 when m_instance != 0 Peter Memishian
  • Re: [networking-discuss] problem with GLDv3 when m_instance != 0 Garrett D'Amore
  • Re: [networking-discuss] problem with GLDv3 when m_instance != 0 Garrett D'Amore
  • Re: [networking-discuss] problem with GLDv3 when m_instance != 0 Garrett D'Amore
• [networking-discuss] UDP Performance 1 Gbps link vhiz
  • [networking-discuss] UDP Performance 1 Gbps link Vishal Ahuja
  • Re: [networking-discuss] UDP Performance 1 Gbps link rajagopal kunhappan
  • Re: [networking-discuss] UDP Performance 1 Gbps link Vishal Ahuja
  • Re: [networking-discuss] UDP Performance 1 Gbps link Simon Leinen
  • Re: [networking-discuss] UDP Performance 1 Gbps link Vishal Ahuja
• [networking-discuss] Polling DLPI handles... Rob Loefman
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Polling DLPI handles... Sebastien Roy
• [networking-discuss] Network configuration API viveks
• [networking-discuss] rwd produces panic in snv_122 Julian Leyh
• [networking-discuss] Start of design review for IP datapath refactoring Erik Nordmark
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of design review for IP datapath refactoring Erik Nordmark
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of design review for IP datapath refactoring Darren Reed
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of design review for IP datapath refactoring Kacheong Poon
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of design review for IP datapath refactoring Darren Reed
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of design review for IP datapath refactoring Erik Nordmark
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of design review for IP datapath refactoring Sebastien Roy
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of design review for IP datapath refactoring Erik Nordmark
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Start of design review for IP datapath refactoring Krishna Yenduri
  • [networking-discuss] Late comments&questions on PSARC/2009/331: unicast IP on multicast ARP, logical interface MTU Nils Goroll
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Late comments&questions on PSARC/2009/331: unicast IP on multicast ARP, logical interface MTU Jason King
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Late comments&questions on PSARC/2009/331: unicast IP on multicast ARP, logical interface MTU Erik Nordmark
• [networking-discuss] mblk and network packets vhiz
  • Re: [networking-discuss] mblk and network packets James Carlson
  • Re: [networking-discuss] mblk and network packets Nicolas Williams
  • Re: [networking-discuss] mblk and network packets vhiz
  • Re: [networking-discuss] mblk and network packets James Carlson
• [networking-discuss] dhcp server on vlans Andrey
  • Re: [networking-discuss] dhcp server on vlans James Carlson
  • Re: [networking-discuss] dhcp server on vlans Андрей Лысов
  • Re: [networking-discuss] dhcp server on vlans Steffen Weiberle
  • Re: [networking-discuss] dhcp server on vlans James Carlson
  • Re: [networking-discuss] dhcp server on vlans Андрей Лысов
  • Re: [networking-discuss] dhcp server on vlans Андрей Лысов
  • Re: [networking-discuss] dhcp server on vlans Андрей Лысов
• [networking-discuss] Man pages for ksockets Russ Weeks
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Man pages for ksockets Anders Persson
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Man pages for ksockets Peter Memishian
• [networking-discuss] question about subnets vattini giacomo
  • Re: [networking-discuss] question about subnets James Carlson
  • Re: [networking-discuss] question about subnets vattini giacomo
• [networking-discuss] Jumbo frames in nxge not working in snv_118 or snv_121 John Ryan
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Jumbo frames in nxge not working in snv_118 or snv_121 Peter Memishian
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Jumbo frames in nxge not working in snv_118 or snv_121 Dale Ghent
• [networking-discuss] timed socket connect from kernel sockets, using callback Peter Cudhea
  • Re: [networking-discuss] timed socket connect from kernel sockets, using callback Anders Persson
  • Re: [networking-discuss] timed socket connect from kernel sockets, using callback Peter Cudhea
  • Re: [networking-discuss] timed socket connect from kernel sockets, using callback Peter Memishian
  • Re: [networking-discuss] timed socket connect from kernel sockets, using callback Peter Cudhea
  • Re: [networking-discuss] timed socket connect from kernel sockets, using callback Peter Memishian
  • Re: [networking-discuss] timed socket connect from kernel sockets, using callback Peter Cudhea
  • Re: [networking-discuss] timed socket connect from kernel sockets, using callback Peter Memishian
• [networking-discuss] Code review request for ILB project ( deadline Sept 11) Sangeeta Misra
• [networking-discuss] My Natrouter doesn't work using XEN. Darko Hojnik
• [networking-discuss] dhcp_ipc_init: cannot bind to port 4999 (agent already running?) woo
  • Re: [networking-discuss] dhcp_ipc_init: cannot bind to port 4999 (agent already running?) Peter Memishian
  • Re: [networking-discuss] dhcp_ipc_init: cannot bind to port 4999 (agent already running?) James Carlson
  • Re: [networking-discuss] dhcp_ipc_init: cannot bind to port 4999 (agent al woo
  • Re: [networking-discuss] dhcp_ipc_init: cannot bind to port 4999 (agent al Peter Memishian
• [networking-discuss] Solaris NICDrv test03- udp nfs corruption test failure Tom Chen
  • Re: [networking-discuss] Solaris NICDrv test03- udp nfs corruption test failure tian robin luo
• [networking-discuss] simple ipfilter rules Cork Smith
  • Re: [networking-discuss] simple ipfilter rules Tony Nguyen
• [networking-discuss] RTM_LOSING makes in.routed nuke default route sowmini . varadhan
  • Re: [networking-discuss] RTM_LOSING makes in.routed nuke default route Sebastien Roy
  • Re: [networking-discuss] RTM_LOSING makes in.routed nuke default route Nicolas Williams
  • Re: [networking-discuss] RTM_LOSING makes in.routed nuke default route sowmini . varadhan
• [networking-discuss] ipnat -l ioctl(SIOCGNATS): I/O error Darko Hojnik
  • Re: [networking-discuss] ipnat -l ioctl(SIOCGNATS): I/O error Peter Memishian
  • Re: [networking-discuss] ipnat -l ioctl(SIOCGNATS): I/O error Darko Hojnik
  • Re: [networking-discuss] ipnat -l ioctl(SIOCGNATS): I/O error Darren Reed
• [networking-discuss] 3 client give the stress to a storage with link aggregation to test perform likaijun
• [networking-discuss] Configuring IPv6 in IPv4 tunnel at boot causes panic Dunc
• [networking-discuss] ipfilter problem Cork Smith
  • Re: [networking-discuss] ipfilter problem Alex Viskovatoff
  • Re: [networking-discuss] ipfilter problem Tony Nguyen
  • Re: [networking-discuss] ipfilter problem Cork Smith
• [networking-discuss] 6263835 inetd could use option to set SO_KEEPALIVE Gary Mills
  • Re: [networking-discuss] 6263835 inetd could use option to set SO_KEEPALIVE Brian Utterback

• Earlier messages
• Later messages