Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS

[William A. Rowe, Jr.]

From: "Roy T. Fielding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 3:56 PM


> Hey, what's going on with the retagging?  There exists on developer dist:
> 
>  -rw-r--r--  rbb      httpd  5383847 Jul 19 16:59 httpd-2_0_21-alpha.tar.Z
>  -rw-r--r--  rbb      httpd      466 Jul 19 16:59 httpd-2_0_21-alpha.tar.Z.asc
>  -rw-r--r--  rbb      httpd  3226188 Jul 19 16:59 httpd-2_0_21-alpha.tar.gz
>  -rw-r--r--  rbb      httpd      466 Jul 19 16:59 httpd-2_0_21-alpha.tar.gz.asc
>  -rw-r--r--  wrowe    httpd  4305440 Jul 20 13:20 httpd-2_0_21-alpha.zip
>  -rw-r--r--  wrowe    httpd      477 Jul 20 13:16 httpd-2_0_21-alpha.zip.asc
> 
> which means that there are now two different versions of the source being
> called 2.0.21?  That is bad.

They are now consistent.

As these files never left http://dev.apache.org/dist for http://www.apache.org/dist 
I don't see an issue with using the 2.0.21 identifier.

Disagreement?