On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 15:26 +0100, Dave F. wrote: > Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 13:44 -0700, Akkana Peck wrote: > > > >> Alex Mauer writes: > >> > >>> As for the values, for a cycle-map I’d be inclined to not even highlight > >>> anything which has only bicycle=yes, because it would quickly overwhelm > >>> everything else – perhaps it’s different where you are, but around here > >>> all roads except motorways (and possibly a few others, specially signed) > >>> allow bicycles and would thus be bicycle=yes (or would be, if I would be > >>> bothered to fully tag every road like that). > >>> > >>> Beyond that there should be only bicycle=designated. There is also > >>> bicycle=official, but perhaps that can be preprocessed into access=no + > >>> bicycle=designated before rendering begins? The meanings are the same... > >>> > >> I've been following along trying to understand the difference > >> between bicycle=designated and bicycle=yes. > >> > > > > Is it a signed bike route (designated), or is it simply not closed to > > bikes (yes)? > > > > > Do you have a wiki link to this?
It's kind of the primary definition of the word "designated." http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/designate
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
