but... if a team member would have a brainstorming with others members to implements a feature, or to explain something he is doing, the e-mail (as is) is not the best tool.
NH is a team and I'm sure you are not using only e-mails to work in your team. Wave has some robots to make a conversation public and we can use it but my point is another... the "public" matter is one a part of the whole picture. 2009/11/1 Chad Lee <[email protected]> > I agree with the anti-wave sentiment. I actually have a wave account - but > for the reasons others have mentioned, I think it is too early. > > Chad > > > On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Wenig, Stefan <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> If you switch to Wave now, NH would probably be the first community-driven >> OSS project with a non-public developers list. Wave is cool, but what >> matters more in OSS? Being open, or using the newest cool tool? >> >> The re-motion team invested several hundred hours into making re-linq a >> nice foundation for LINQ to NH, and I think the effort has paid well. >> Without invites, we would be locked out. Others just follow the list to get >> a deeper understanding, and some of them eventually join the discussions, >> send patches and eventually become committers themselves. How would this >> work if only a few people have access to the developers list? >> >> I know that Wave is tempting. But please, just resist until it's open for >> everyone. >> >> Cheers, >> Stefan >> http://www.re-motion.org/blogs/team >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: [email protected] [mailto:nhibernate- >> > [email protected]] On Behalf Of schlachtzeuger >> > Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 2:55 PM >> > To: nhibernate-development >> > Subject: [nhibernate-development] Re: Wave >> > >> > >> > +1 to jonathon and michael >> > >> > >> > just by following this list it is more easier for me and my company to >> > work with nhibernate and make decisions concerning nhibernate and >> > surrounding contrib projects >> > >> > >> > On Oct 30, 4:32 am, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > I am in a similar position to Michael, as I am sure many other people >> > are. I >> > > read everything, but post very little; and do not have a wave >> > account. >> > > >> > > AFAIK, going with wave would mean google doesn't index the mailing >> > list >> > > content, where many users find answers without needing to ask. The >> > google >> > > groups mailing list search functionality just doesn't cut it, >> > compared to >> > > google search. Maybe the solution is poppywave as mentioned. >> > > >> > > If you do go with wave won't everyone have to remember to add >> > poppywave to >> > > the conversation otherwise no one else will see the conversation? >> > This >> > > breaks the OSS mantra for discussions of "if it didn't happen on the >> > mailing >> > > list, it didn't happen". >> > > >> > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Michael Teper >> > <[email protected]>wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > A couple of thoughts/questions on Wave. >> > > >> > > > I've been lurking in this list for a very long time. While I am not >> > able to >> > > > contribute to development, observing this list is very useful to >> > > > understanding of both the innards of NH and the direction in which >> > it is >> > > > going. Particularly helpful have been discussions on NH Linq. I am >> > sure I am >> > > > not alone lurking and reading, and I am sure I am not alone >> > appreciating the >> > > > convenience of doing this through email. >> > > >> > > > I haven't played with Wave (no invite, no time), so forgive the >> > ignorance. >> > > > What happens to Wave conversations? Is there a permanent record >> > that may be >> > > > monitored? Is there a way to connect it to this list? Or, at least >> > a way to >> > > > pipe into email? >> > > >> > > > I don't want to obstruct progress and if Wave helps the velocity of >> > this >> > > > project, then by all means +1 from me. I'd like to be able to >> > continue to >> > > > lurk though, if possible. >> > > >> > > > :) >> > > >> > > > Thanks! >> > > > -Michael >> > > >> > > > ________________________________________ >> > > > From: [email protected] [ >> > > > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Jokin [ >> > > > [email protected]] >> > > > Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 11:03 AM >> > > > To: nhibernate-development >> > > > Subject: [nhibernate-development] Re: Wave >> > > >> > > > I have a pair of them ready to ship, if you don't mind fabio, send >> > me >> > > > an email with the address of who need to be invited. >> > > >> > > > On 29 oct, 18:49, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > > and probably Oren (I'm not sure). >> > > >> > > > > 2009/10/29 Richard Brown <[email protected]> >> > > >> > > > > > Me. >> > > >> > > > > > On 29 Oct 2009 17:45, "Steve Strong" <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > > > > For sure. Who here doesn't have a Wave invite yet? >> > > >> > > > > > On 29 Oct 2009, at 18:30, Fabio Maulo wrote: > before try it >> > > > > > the entirely team will need an accou... >> > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > Fabio Maulo >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Jono- Hide quoted text - >> > > >> > > - Show quoted text - >> > > -- Fabio Maulo
