> Michael Richardson wrote:
> > ... I tried to build the other one (uw-imap?) that had MH support, but
> > it was too much effort because the "libmh" library was pretty much
> > impossible
> > to build/configure.
> sorry about that. (i was the maintainer in the years up until mark's
> death.) the ruinously bad property of uw-imap's MH implementation, which
> i could not fix due to an impedance mismatch between the protocol and
> the MH message number definition, is that whenever you refile a message,
> both folders have to be fully rescanned.
> > For my archives I'm now thinking that maybe I should just convert it all to
> > Maildir. Hmm.
> that's what i did. but now i have no shell tools that do what "pick"
> does. ouch.
i know it's not pick, but i find i mostly use mairix on my mail even
though it's all in MH folders, simply because it's so much faster. i
often run pick on the resulting mairix results folder, though.
paul fox, p...@foxharp.boston.ma.us (arlington, ma, where it's 24.8 degrees)