paul wrote: > > > Michael Richardson wrote: > > ... I tried to build the other one (uw-imap?) that had MH support, but > > it was too much effort because the "libmh" library was pretty much > > impossible > > to build/configure. > > sorry about that. (i was the maintainer in the years up until mark's > death.) the ruinously bad property of uw-imap's MH implementation, which > i could not fix due to an impedance mismatch between the protocol and > the MH message number definition, is that whenever you refile a message, > both folders have to be fully rescanned. > > > For my archives I'm now thinking that maybe I should just convert it all to > > Maildir. Hmm. > > that's what i did. but now i have no shell tools that do what "pick" > does. ouch.
i know it's not pick, but i find i mostly use mairix on my mail even though it's all in MH folders, simply because it's so much faster. i often run pick on the resulting mairix results folder, though. paul =---------------------- paul fox, [email protected] (arlington, ma, where it's 24.8 degrees) -- Nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
