On Friday, December 6, 2013 12:48:06 PM UTC+4, greelgorke wrote:
> > Second desaster resulted from the overly heavy reactions on github and > here of several ppl, who are ocnsidered to be community leaders due to > their merits or vocal presence. > Who are you talking about? I don't see any heavy reactions from anyone I know for their node.js-related work. Pull request trolls ain't the community. > > Third: What the hell is this Joyent guy thinking? Why is he even in an > executive of company which wanna be an enterprise level serviceprovider. > This blogpost, on the corporate blog, was a NO GO. If i would be part of > Joyent advisory board, i would fire him. 3 times. Because he's damaging the > company. > He is not damaging the company. He is damaging node.js core trying to save company's image. I agree about firing 3 times though. Fith: I wish, everyone in this conversion would disclose his/hers > relationships and interessts. i.E. first i heard about StrongLoop it looked > like a promissing turn to mature the Node eosystem and make it ready for > enterprize level consulting buisiness. But the more i saw and read, the > more i become uncomfortable. this strong advertisements attitude (no pun > intended) here in the list. Now i hear that they battle Joyent for power > over node. What? I understand why ppl calling for a foundation, but this > would not end struggles for power, it would just instutitionalize it in to > a commitee. > I'm a tiny bit of a core developer from the times when core was kinda awful, currently working a lot on node.js modules. Have deep respect for all node.js maintainers (including Ryan, and including Ben), one of them even made me change codestyle with a certain open letter, huh. Know nobody personally though. Not affiliated with any company who is making business around commercial node.js support. Had a good opinion about Joyent because they didn't interfere with node in the past, although that opinion is now changed. Interests are: to see node.js core developing as fast and good as it was 2 weeks ago, and prevent similar things in the future as much as possible. The StrongLoop's battle is a battle over trademarks right now. It is perfectly reasonable request from their position, that said, I don't care about legal stuff much. So i have a proposal too. Joyent is stewarding Node, and they did a great > job so far. But i think we've come to a point at which it could be good for > us and for joyent to install a controlling board. something like an > advisory board elected by the community. they would have a veto rights on > strategic decisions regarding node.js future and provide a moderator > service to the comunity in conflict cases. this is kind of a compromise > between a non-profid foundation and a profit company stewardship. > And how that controlling board is supposed to influence certain offensive blog posts from certain companies?. -- -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
