I had a fiver on that too.  Worth a go.

2009/11/26 LEESE Matthew <[email protected]>

>  Okay, while we're all fessing up to embarrassing lapses, see attached.
>
>  ------------------------------
>  *From:* Steven Millward [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Thursday, 26 November 2009 1:31 PM
>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] New Pompey Manger Odds [sec=unclassified]
>
>   That is very embarassing.  You and Ipswich are owning up to some
> embarassing things on here today.
>
>
>
> 2009/11/26 Rog & Rita <[email protected]>
>
>>  He has reasonable provincial form.
>> In Group company it's woeful, either with no money or stacks of it.
>>
>> Only a complete idiot would back him to do anything useful in this
>> division.
>> When I backed us at $251 to win the division "without the top four" I was
>> stonkered and felt so ashamed the next morning on finding out what I'd done.
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> *From:* Paul Taylor [mailto:[email protected]]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, 26 November 2009 11:57 AM
>> *To:* Wolves
>>
>> *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] New Pompey Manger Odds [sec=unclassified]
>>
>>   The only way to get Premiership experience and to become a good
>> Premiership manager is to actually be in the division. I think give him a
>> full season run, and if we stay up, lets see how he goes with more money.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Subject: RE: [NSWolves] New Pompey Manger Odds [sec=unclassified]
>> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:25:24 +1000
>> From: [email protected]
>> To: [email protected]
>>
>> What a terrible predicament we are in, we've got a manager who may just
>> fluke it and keep us up, but if we do go down we know he's a good
>> championship manager.
>>
>> So what you are saying is we are unlikely to sack him this season because
>> he'll be ok in the lower league?
>>
>> Why does he deserve a full season this year???? Surely if it looks likely
>> that he will take us down, we should act whilst there is still time for us
>> to be saved?....Another month and we'll have a better idea.
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> *From:* Steven Millward [mailto:[email protected]]
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 25 November 2009 13:20
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] New Pompey Manger Odds [sec=unclassified]
>>
>> I doubt MM will get sacked until he's in the same position as DJ next
>> season.  I can't see him getting the boot this season no matter what the
>> result.  He deserves a full go this season and he's the man for the job next
>> season if we are down.
>>
>> 2009/11/25 Marcus Chantry <[email protected]>
>>
>>  in this age of "player power", maybe we should do away with the manager
>> role, after all the manager had no influence over the performance of the
>> team if I remember correctly ;-) and let the players decide how they want to
>> play?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> *From:* Steven Millward [mailto:[email protected]]
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 25 November 2009 1:34 PM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] New Pompey Manger Odds [sec=unclassified]
>>
>>   And replace him with Paul Ince I presume?
>>
>>
>>
>> 2009/11/25 Marcus Chantry <[email protected]>
>>
>>  so if Pompey can sack their manager so soon, why can't we do the same?
>> Come on Morgan, you know it makes sense...
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> *From:* Morris, Lee SGT [mailto:[email protected]]
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 25 November 2009 10:54 AM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* [NSWolves] New Pompey Manger Odds [sec=unclassified]
>>
>>
>>
>> From William Hill:
>>
>> HILLS: PORTSMOUTH NEXT PERMANENT BOSS..
>>
>> DARREN FERGUSSON 2/1
>> ALAN CURBISHLEY 3/1
>> STEVE COPPELL 4/1
>> AVRAM GRANT 5/1
>> STEVE MCCLAREN 12/1
>> KEVIN KEEGAN 16/1
>> PAUL GROVES 16/1
>> JOE JORDAN 16/1
>> GRAEME SOUNESS 16/1
>> ALAN SHEARER 16/1
>> PAUL JEWELL 16/1
>> DAVID O LEARY 20/1
>> GARETH SOUTHGATE 20/1
>> SLAVEN BILIC 20/1
>> TERRY VENABLES 20/1
>> SVEN GORAN 20/1
>> OWEN COYLE 25/1
>> HARRY REDKNAPP 50/1
>> TONY ADAMS 100/1
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
>> The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not
>> the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
>> email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
>> the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
>> expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
>> Macquarie.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
>>
>> --
>> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
>> --
>> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
>> ------------------------------
>> Head to the Daily Blob on Windows Live For more of what happens 
>> online<http://windowslive.ninemsn.com.au/blog.aspx>
>>
>> __________ NOD32 2175 (20070409) Information __________
>>
>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>> --
>> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
>>
>> --
>> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
>>
>
> --
> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
>
> Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This
> e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the
> named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged
> information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any
> mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any
> unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed
> in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily
> the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
> immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not
> disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended
> recipient.
>
> --
> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
>

-- 
Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid

Reply via email to