No, regular Win2k/AD.  The modems are currently on an NT4 machine.

-Warren

 
> Are you using a Citrix Metaframe server by chance?
> 
>  
> Roger Wright
> Southern Commerce Bank
> ___
> 
> The earth is like a tiny grain of sand, only much, much heavier.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Warren Cundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:30 PM
> To: NT 2000 Discussions
> Subject: RE: 56k Modem Question
> 
> 
> I just need dial-in access for a few users who are 
> complaining about the
> current modems (28.8k).  But what I'm getting is that if I 
> buy a 56k modem
> (standard USR v.90), dial-in users with 56k will still only connect at
> 33.6k?
> 
> My options are to go digital, which seems very expensive for 
> what I need,
> which is 1-2 dial-in lines at this speed.
> 
> -Warren
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tim Rutherford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 6:44 AM
> > To: NT 2000 Discussions
> > Subject: RE: 56k Modem Question
> > 
> > 
> > How about using one leg of an ISDN line? that would be 64k
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Valiantis
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 8:11 PM
> > To: NT 2000 Discussions
> > Subject: RE: 56k Modem Question
> > 
> > 
> > As far as I know, a 56k modem, when connected to a digital 
> > device at the
> > other end, will allow 56k download and 33k upload. This I believe is
> > inherent in the technology used. However, v.92 may be different.
> > 
> > So in essence, roaming client with a 56k modem dials your 
> > head office. If
> > they connect to another 56k modem at your end, then I think 
> > they will only
> > get a max of 33.6 connection speed. If they connect to some 
> sort of a
> > digital device, i.e. an EdgeBlaster or something similar as 
> > used by ISP's,
> > then they will get 56k down and 33.6 up.
> > 
> > Hope this helps.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Tony.
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chris Hyche [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, 10 January 2002 7:44 AM
> > To: NT 2000 Discussions
> > Subject: RE: 56k Modem Question
> > 
> > 
> > You can try one of the new v.92 modems. I think they can 
> > upload faster.
> > Everyone involved will need the new standard though either by 
> > modem BIOS
> > update  or a new modem.
> > 
> > 
> > Audio International
> > Chris Hyche
> > MIS Technician
> > Phone: (501) 801-0457
> > Fax: (501) 801-0421
> > www.audiointl.com
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Warren Cundy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 3:27 PM
> > To: NT 2000 Discussions
> > Subject: 56k Modem Question
> > 
> > 
> > I have a dumb 56k modem question that I can't figure out.. 
> > what kind of
> > modem do I need to buy for users out of the office to be able 
> > to connect at
> > 56k and download?  All the modems I can see (including the 
> > ones we use),
> > offer 56k download channels, but only 28.8k upload.
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > -Warren
> > 
> > 
> > ------
> > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > ------
> > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > ------
> > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ------
> > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> ------
> You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> _______
> NOTICE:  The information contained in this electronic message 
> is considered
> privileged and confidential under Florida Statutes 455.251 
> and 3905.017.  It
> is intended solely for the use of the recipient named above.  
> If the reader
> is not the recipient named above, you are hereby notified that any
> dissemination, distribution, copying or disclosure of the 
> contents of this
> message is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
> message in error,
> please immediately notify the sender and destroy the original 
> message.  
> 
> 
> 
> ------
> You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

------
You are subscribed as [email protected]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to