Sorry Larry, I think you are in the minority.  It seems to me that those
that with MCSE get on first string, while those that think that the trench
experience is all they need, sit on the sidelines.

Not to say trench experience is worthless.  I hope it counts for something
since I have 15+ years of it.  My last position was as a Solutions Architect
with Compaq...so how's that for trench experience.   But I think an MCSE
still has value.  It shows that you have a BASE knowledge.  It's a starting
point in a conversation.

Cheers,
Leonard



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Larry A. Duncan
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:42 PM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: MCSE Certification


Sorry Leonard, I just don't see it that way. This is thread is beginning to
scream "how can I show I have both". That type of "showiness" just doesn't
cut it with a lot of the 'old timers'. You prove yourself in the trenches -
not in your signature line.


Larry A. Duncan
Field Systems Engineer, Southeast Region
Altiris Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

T: 615.599.5031
T: 800.869.9747
F: 615.599.5259

Have you maximized your investment in SMS, MOM and other Windows Mgmt tools?
Get expert answers, hands-on training, and great utilities at the Microsoft
Management Summit. Register today at http://www.altiris.com/aem/mmsconf2002/

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leonard Lee
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 7:21 PM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: MCSE Certification

I understand the guidelines regarding the use of the logo.  However, I don't
think Microsoft have sufficiently addressed the problem of differentiating
the two groups: NT and 2000.  Before the MCSE 2000 track, an MCSE at the end
of your name meant you had the base knowledge for NT.  A person with an MCSE
at the end of his/her name did not have to explain anything.  Now, you can't
tell if the person has NT or 2000 or both (from just looking at the MCSE at
the end of their name).

If Microsoft had kept their word and de-certified the NT group from using
the MCSE logo(at the end of last year if they had not re-certified under the
2000 track) then the MCSE designation would remain clear.   Never-the-less,
it did not happen, and that made the use of the MCSE logo, by itself,
unclear.

Don't get me wrong, I am glad Microsoft still recognizes the MCSE
certification for the NT track.  I think those with MCSE on NT have skills
that will be needed for many more years then all of us  want to happen.  I
know of migration projects still involving NT3.51/MS Mail environments.
There are a lot more NT 4.0 system deployed then NT 3.51 systems, so one can
only imagine how long it will take for the world to be rid of NT 4...if
ever.

Certification enables us to differentiate our acquired based knowledge by
tagging a few captialized words at the end of our name.  A person with MCSA
at the end of the name means that person is a Microsoft Certified Systems
Administrator.  I know that person has written at lease four exams on the
certification track.  I know they have studied how to
install/configure/administrate Windows 2000 Professional and Server, as well
as they have the base networking course, and they have done at lease one
elective of their choice.  The same can be said about MCSD, MCAD, and MCDBA.
As for the MCSE certification...it's not clear.

I think the person who has achieved their MCSE from the NT and 2000 track
has the right to SHOW that they have achieved a level of base knowledge that
neither an MCSE NT only or an MCSE 2000 only has attained.  I also think
that the MCSE designation is less meaningful if you allow these three groups
to use the same MCSE logo.


Regards,
Leonard Lee


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Larry A. Duncan
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:44 PM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: MCSE Certification


All the guidelines regarding the use of your logo and certifications can be
found here:

Microsoft Certified Professional Logo Guidelines
http://www.microsoft.com/traincert/mcpexams/policies/logo.asp



Larry A. Duncan
Field Systems Engineer, Southeast Region
Altiris Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

T: 615.599.5031
T: 800.869.9747
F: 615.599.5259

Have you maximized your investment in SMS, MOM and other Windows Mgmt tools?
Get expert answers, hands-on training, and great utilities at the Microsoft
Management Summit. Register today at http://www.altiris.com/aem/mmsconf2002/

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of James Winzenz
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 1:27 PM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: MCSE Certification

If you have both certs, according to Microsoft (IIRC), you are supposed to
list them separately on your resume or business card . . . like

MCSE NT 4.0
MCSE Windows 2000

James Winzenz, MCSE, A+
Associate Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.


-----Original Message-----
From: Menke, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:25 PM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: MCSE Certification


I have been interviewing lately and they seem to like the fact I out MCSE
4\2k on resume

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 1:52 PM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: MCSE Certification


I use:

MCSE, nya-nya nya-nya-nya :-p

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 1:33 PM
> To: NT 2000 Discussions
> Subject: MCSE Certification
>
>
> For those that have done the MCSE for NT and 2000, how are
> you showing it on
> your business cards?
>
> ie.
> MCSE (NT+2000)
> MCSE NT+2000
> MCSE (NT/2000)
> MCSE NT/2000
> MCSE NT MCSE 2000
> MCSE NT 2000
> MCSE
> or any other way?
>
> Regards,
> Leonard Lee
>
>
>
>
> ------
> You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
>

------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%

------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%

------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.343 / Virus Database: 190 - Release Date: 3/22/2002

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.343 / Virus Database: 190 - Release Date: 3/22/2002



------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%


------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.343 / Virus Database: 190 - Release Date: 3/22/2002

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.343 / Virus Database: 190 - Release Date: 3/22/2002



------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%


------
You are subscribed as [email protected]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to