...and even with a switch...how about those systems that are turned off, not
on the network, or have badly configured network settings....won't catch
those.

Do a physical inventory.  100 PC's in a factory...part-time 2 days a
week...so what.  I did a physical inventory of 800 PC in a factory in less
then 3 days (a team of 3 guys)....so, with 100 PC...not a big job at all.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anthony L.
> Sollars
> Sent: April 22, 2002 7:52 PM
> To: NT 2000 Discussions
> Subject: RE: Network discovery
>
>
> There really isn't anything you can do about this man, the
> only way you can
> make this work would be to have switches in your network and
> or ge the mac
> address info from a the GW router, which you said isn't possible.
>
> I have an idea, call up a vendor and work out a deal on a
> nice manageable
> switch with a full set of snmp features. Get them to agree to
> a short trial
> period to see if the equipment works as promised. Use the
> equipment long
> enough to record the address info you need then ship it back.
> I happen to
> know DEll has a 30 day money back guarentee, and if you have
> net-30 terms
> this can be very easy to do. WE just did this with a 4 LTO drive tape
> library.
>
>
> Well hope it all works out.
>
>
> -TOny
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:54 PM
> To: NT 2000 Discussions
> Subject: RE: Network discovery
>
>
> Yeah, but don't forget the 'rogue' machines I'm trying to find out
> provably don't have a default gateway configured.
>
> My current IP address is 192.168.69.111
>
> I have a machine connected to the same hub as I am, with the IP
> 10.10.10.10 and no default gateway
>
> There's no way I can make LANGuard see that machine unless:
>
> 1- I have an IP of the same subnet
> 2- I correctly configure TCP/IP on that machine.
>
> This totally defeats my purpose! I was thinking it was
> possible to send
> a broadcast and receiving information about all machines connected to
> the network, even if they had a different subnet and no gateway!
>
> Filipe Joel de Almeida
> Network Consultant
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mobile: +351 967819600
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of King, John
> Sent: segunda-feira, 22 de Abril de 2002 21:14
> To: NT 2000 Discussions
> Subject: RE: Network discovery
>
> I am not sure how Etherpeek works, but with a basic sniffer
> you will see
> an
> IP address of some sort.  Which from what you said sounds
> like what you
> see.
>
>
> Now for example, say that you see the IP address 192.168.1.127 in your
> sniffer program.
>
> Open LANguard or any other network scanner and for an address
> range put
> in
> 192.168.1.1 - 192.168.1.254 ...  Get it?  Now the scanner
> will scan all
> of
> the addresses in between and show you which ones are live..  Just look
> for
> the first three numbers of the octet and put 1-254 at the end..  Does
> that
> help?  Maybe you already understood this..?  All that the sniffer will
> do is
> point you in the proper direction, by showing you the 'active' IPs on
> your
> network.  Then you have to scan the full subnet ranger with a
> scanner to
> find out what IPs are really being used..
>
> Good Luck
>
>    ~John
>
> ~~~Snort, sniffing packets not glue~~~
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 4:06 PM
> To: NT 2000 Discussions
> Subject: RE: Network discovery
>
>
> Well, with etherpeek I can only see information packet by packet, and
> nothing shows up on the nodes or protocols tab... any help on
> how to use
> all the data I have already captured to give me a list of all the IP
> addresses?
>
> With Languard, it requires me to specify witch IP's to scan,
> but I don't
> know that!!
>
> Am I messing up somewhere?
>
> Filipe Joel de Almeida
> Network Consultant
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mobile: +351 967819600
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Allhiser
> Sent: segunda-feira, 22 de Abril de 2002 20:41
> To: NT 2000 Discussions
> Subject: RE: Network discovery
>
> Ahh.  You can let the sniffer run for a while.  This will let you know
> who is
> doing what on your network.
>
> For a simple list of addresses, try a simple scanner:
> http://www.gfi.com/lannetscan/index.htm
>
> This, of course depends on what hosts are running at the time.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 2:42 PM
> To: NT 2000 Discussions
> Subject: RE: Network discovery
>
>
> I've installed the demo version, and it allows me to see packet by
> packet what's
> the source address and the destination address, but it seems
> there's no
> way of
> just getting a list of all the addresses.
>
> Filipe Joel de Almeida
> Network Consultant
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mobile: +351 967819600
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Allhiser
> Sent: segunda-feira, 22 de Abril de 2002 19:13
> To: NT 2000 Discussions
> Subject: RE: Network discovery
>
> Depending on the hardware you connect the sniffer to a mirrored or
> spanned port.
> the port effectively becomes a hub.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:09 PM
> To: NT 2000 Discussions
> Subject: RE: Network discovery
>
>
> Thanks, I'll look it out.
>
> What If I was connected by switches, what could I do to do this?
>
> Filipe Joel de Almeida
> Network Consultant
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mobile: +351 967819600
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Allhiser
> Sent: segunda-feira, 22 de Abril de 2002 18:52
> To: NT 2000 Discussions
> Subject: RE: Network discovery
>
> Yes.  Especially since you are connected by hubs.
>
> www.wildpackets.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:01 PM
> To: NT 2000 Discussions
> Subject: RE: Network discovery
>
>
> Is that software able to sniff my network and find all active IP
> addresses in
> any subnet? If so, where can I get it?
>
> Filipe Joel de Almeida
> Network Consultant
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mobile: +351 967819600
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Allhiser
> Sent: segunda-feira, 22 de Abril de 2002 18:46
> To: NT 2000 Discussions
> Subject: RE: Network discovery
>
> I use and like Wild Packets EtherPeek.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 12:50 PM
> To: NT 2000 Discussions
> Subject: RE: Network discovery
>
>
> > If you network is as disastrous as it sounds, then you may not know
> what
> > IP ranges are being used.  If that is the case maybe a TCP sniffer
> could
> > shed some light on what IPs are on the network.
>
> You are right! That is specifically what Is happening! Isn't there any
> good
> sniffer that could tell me what IP's are running around on my
> network? I
> can't
> seem to be able to make windump work!
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------
> You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
>
> ------
> You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
>
>
>
> ------
> You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
>
> ------
> You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
>


------
You are subscribed as [email protected]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to