> I disagree. > > Using both sets of permissions (share and file) is a more > effective way > to manage resources, rather than letting everyone connect to every > share, only to find that they can't access anything below it. > > There are very few shares that I'll leave with "EVERYONE:F" on them.
I don't know of a circumstance in which you'd ever set "EVERYONE:F," considering Full Control permissions allow a user to change the permissions of a share. "EVERYONE:C" would normally be sufficient. Any file READ permissions would then override this share permission, and CHANGE permissions would carry on. I do agree, however, that in a basic context, you can restrict permissions by effectively maintaining both file and share permissions. -- Adam Smith Information Technology Officer SAGE Automation Ltd. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sageautomation.com Phone: (08) 8276 0703 Fax: (08) 8276 0799 Mobile: 0414 895 273 ------ You are subscribed as [email protected] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
