Remember, too, that with NT/2000 clients, you don't have to create a whole bunch of shares.
You can just map folks to a deeper level if necessary. ASB http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 8:25 AM To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: Re: Possible STUPID NTFS Question I just found that same article too! My boss is a tried and true Novell man so he assumed it could be done under NT too. I guess we will settle for them seeing; but not being able to access the directories. As to Ed's questions, my answer is very similair to Roger's. The a/b/c was just an example but in reality I will need to set permissions on about 30 or 40 different sub directories so sharing them all out would prove even more cumbersome and much more of a maintenance nightmare. :) Thanks for everyone's input! Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "NT 2000 Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 7:23 AM Subject: RE: Possible STUPID NTFS Question > I don't have time to do a full trial of this, but I know I've seen it > done in the past. I believe it's a combination of the rights "List > Contents" and > "Traverse", but I can't remember for sure. > > I'll be darned. Q303758 claims it can't be done. I still swear I've > seen it, > however. I just don't remember how it was done. > > > ------------------------------------------------------ > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > Atlanta, GA > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 3:07 PM > > To: NT 2000 Discussions > > Subject: Re: Possible STUPID NTFS Question > > > > > > What I cannot seem to get to work is this: > > > > no matter how I configure the permissions, you can either see all > > the folders below the root (although perhaps not access them all) or > > access (or > > see) none of them as the removal of the folder permission wont let > > you in. > > > > Say the root of C:\ has a folder called TEMP. > > > > (C:\TEMP\a > > C:\TEMP\b > > C:\TEMP\c) > > > > Temp is shared as VOL1. You want everyone to be able to map VOL1 and > > then see folders a,b or c depending on their assigned rights. I > > can only get it > > to work all or nothing. You can either see them all or none > > (but I can vary > > the levels of access.) > > > > Is this the limitation? > > > > Chris > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "NT 2000 Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 11:52 AM > > Subject: RE: Possible STUPID NTFS Question > > > > > > > First of all, the OS Wars are maintained at http://slashdot.org > > > > > > Second, if you're going to bash one OS as being inferior to > > another, have > > > your facts straight. In this case, you're wrong. > > > > > > Right Click | Properties | Security Tab | Advanced (button) > > > > > > The permission in question is called "List" and can be > > applied to any > > folder > > > or file and user or group combination. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > > > Sr. Systems Administrator > > > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > > > Atlanta, GA > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 11:38 AM > > > > To: NT 2000 Discussions > > > > Subject: Re: Possible STUPID NTFS Question > > > > > > > > > > > > Nope you cant do this on Windoze. You can do this on > > > > Netware, the OS of choice > > > > for a truly well run enterprise. > > > > > > > > On 30 Dec 2002 at 9:45, Chris H wrote: > > > > > > > > > I have never actually had to do this before (but I do now > > > > thanks to my boss! > > > > > :) > > > > > > > > > > Can you set up NTFS permission so if there are a group of > > > > folders in the > > > > > root of a shared folder, a group has CHANGE SHARE > > > > permissions and then > > > > > CHANGE FOLDER permissions on ONE of the folders but not > > > > even SEE (LIST?) the > > > > > rest of the folders? I have tried selecting the rest and > > > > setting DENY on > > > > > every option but you can still list them and see them. > > > > Ideas? Am I missing > > > > > something stupid? Windows 2000 server sp3 > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > Chris > > > > > ------ You are subscribed as [email protected] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
