I'd agree. In a number of organizations, including mine, it makes more business sense to have one top level share under which all departments' directories exist.
------------------------------------------------------ Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 10:05 PM > To: NT 2000 Discussions > Subject: RE: Possible STUPID NTFS Question > > > > > Why not just share out a, b and c? > > > > That's a great idea. > > It depends on the end result. > > Suppose hypothetically, one person is a member of two groups who have > read access, and this share is accessible by a login script set drive > mapping? > > Even when using an 'IFMEMBER' statement or similar to create drive > mappings based on group membership, if a user is a member of > two, or all > three groups, they'd have an excessive amount of drive letters. > > > Adam's $0.02 > > > > ------ > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% > ------ You are subscribed as [email protected] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
