I just found that same article too! My boss is a tried and true Novell man
so he assumed it could be done under NT too. I guess we will settle for them
seeing; but not being able to access the directories. As to Ed's questions,
my answer is very similair to Roger's. The a/b/c was just an example but in
reality I will need to set permissions on about 30 or 40 different sub
directories so sharing them all out would prove even more cumbersome and
much more of a maintenance nightmare. :)

Thanks for everyone's input!

Chris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "NT 2000 Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 7:23 AM
Subject: RE: Possible STUPID NTFS Question


> I don't have time to do a full trial of this, but I know I've seen it done
> in the past. I believe it's a combination of the rights "List Contents"
and
> "Traverse", but I can't remember for sure.
>
> I'll be darned. Q303758 claims it can't be done. I still swear I've seen
it,
> however. I just don't remember how it was done.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
> Atlanta, GA
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 3:07 PM
> > To: NT 2000 Discussions
> > Subject: Re: Possible STUPID NTFS Question
> >
> >
> > What I cannot seem to get to work is this:
> >
> > no matter how I configure the permissions, you can either see all the
> > folders below the root (although perhaps not access them all)
> > or access (or
> > see) none of them as the removal of the folder permission
> > wont let you in.
> >
> > Say the root of C:\ has a folder called TEMP.
> >
> > (C:\TEMP\a
> > C:\TEMP\b
> > C:\TEMP\c)
> >
> > Temp is shared as VOL1. You want everyone to be able to map
> > VOL1 and then
> > see folders a,b or c depending on their assigned rights. I
> > can only get it
> > to work all or nothing. You can either see them all or none
> > (but I can vary
> > the levels of access.)
> >
> > Is this the limitation?
> >
> > Chris
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "NT 2000 Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 11:52 AM
> > Subject: RE: Possible STUPID NTFS Question
> >
> >
> > > First of all, the OS Wars are maintained at http://slashdot.org
> > >
> > > Second, if you're going to bash one OS as being inferior to
> > another, have
> > > your facts straight. In this case, you're wrong.
> > >
> > > Right Click | Properties | Security Tab | Advanced (button)
> > >
> > > The permission in question is called "List" and can be
> > applied to any
> > folder
> > > or file and user or group combination.
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------
> > > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> > > Sr. Systems Administrator
> > > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
> > > Atlanta, GA
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 11:38 AM
> > > > To: NT 2000 Discussions
> > > > Subject: Re: Possible STUPID NTFS Question
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Nope you cant do this on Windoze.   You can do this on
> > > > Netware, the OS of choice
> > > > for a truly well run enterprise.
> > > >
> > > > On 30 Dec 2002 at 9:45, Chris H wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I have never actually had to do this before (but I do now
> > > > thanks to my boss!
> > > > > :)
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you set up NTFS permission so if there are a group of
> > > > folders in the
> > > > > root of a shared folder, a group has CHANGE SHARE
> > > > permissions and then
> > > > > CHANGE FOLDER permissions on ONE of the folders but not
> > > > even SEE (LIST?) the
> > > > > rest of the folders? I have tried selecting the rest and
> > > > setting DENY on
> > > > > every option but you can still list them and see them.
> > > > Ideas? Am I missing
> > > > > something stupid? Windows 2000 server sp3
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > >
> > > > > Chris
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ------
> > > > > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > > To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -- Windows has problems.   Novell has solutions.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------
> > > > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
> > > >
> > >
> > > ------
> > > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
> >
> >
> > ------
> > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
> >
>
> ------
> You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%


------
You are subscribed as [email protected]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to